[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [TRNSYS-users] TRNSYS-users Digest, Vol 166, Issue 28

Hi Jeff, how are you?

Thanks for the answer.

The old version of the 536 is as you mention, but the new one isn’t.

As I’ve mentioned I have uninstalled and install again TRNSYS with no luck, what can I try?

Could you send me the type?

Best,
José


On 22 oct. 2018, at 3:40 p.m., trnsys-users-request@lists.onebuilding.org wrote:

Send TRNSYS-users mailing list submissions to
trnsys-users@lists.onebuilding.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/trnsys-users-onebuilding.org

or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
trnsys-users-request@lists.onebuilding.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
trnsys-users-owner@lists.onebuilding.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of TRNSYS-users digest..."
Today's Topics:

  1. Re: Type 536 changed after compiling? (Jeff Thornton)

From: Jeff Thornton <thornton@tess-inc.com>
Subject: Re: [TRNSYS-users] Type 536 changed after compiling?
Date: 22 de octubre de 2018, 3:40:04 p.m. UYT
To: "TRNSYS users mailing list at OneBuilding.org" <trnsys-users@lists.onebuilding.org>
Reply-To: thornton@tess-inc.com


Jose,

The proforma parameter order should match the order listed in the source code.  In my version that should be logical unit, then # transverse, then # longitudinal.

 

Jeff

 
---
Jeff Thornton
President - TESS LLC
3 N. Pinckney Street, Suite 202, Madison WI USA 53703
Office: (608) 274-2577  Fax: (608) 278-1475
www.tess-inc.com
E-Mail: thornton@tess-inc.com

On 10/22/2018 1:31 pm, José María Roca via TRNSYS-users wrote:

Hi everyone, 
 
I’ve tried to changed the fortran code to print some intermediate variables but with no luck.
 
The type536 stopped working altogether…
 
I’ve uninstalled trnsys and started over, however the installed type 536 still doesn’t work with a message that says "The utility subroutine DATA cannot read the specified input data file. Make sure that the file is ASSIGNed correctly and that the file has the correct format”.
 
I’ve then noticed that an older deck does work with the 536 and when looking into the parameters they are in a different order. The IAM portion of parameters changed placed within the list.
 
Could someone tell me what to do? 
 
If I try connecting a fresh type 536 it doesn’t work, but if I open the old deck it does work… I’m baffled.
 
I’m attaching a screen capture of the old and the new parameter list.
 
I hope to hear from someone.
 
Best,
José M. Roca<New.png><Old.png>

_______________________________________________
TRNSYS-users mailing list
TRNSYS-users@lists.onebuilding.org
http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/trnsys-users-onebuilding.org


_______________________________________________
TRNSYS-users mailing list
TRNSYS-users@lists.onebuilding.org
http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/trnsys-users-onebuilding.org