Adnan,
I'd suggest looking at a few things.
First, define your time step using an equation like DELT = 10/60
rather than as 0.1667. 0.1667 hours is close to but not exactly 10
minutes.
Second, use a Type65 connected directly to your Type9 and make
sure that the data that you're getting from Type9 is what you'd
expect. I suspect that you'll find some problems in the parameters
that determine how the initial values are defined, whether you
want each value to be interpolated, and whether each value in the
data file is reported as an average over each 10 minute period or
whether each is an instantaneous value reported at the end of the
time period.
Third, make sure that Type9 is NOT interpolating the solar radiation data. Type16 does the solar interpolation and you don't want it done twice.
kind regards,
David
I am using 1 hr and 10 min weather data for the same location and year but my results are very different. i think there is a problem in TYPE 9, 16 and simulation time step setting while i use 10 min interval weather data. with 1 hr interval everything is ok.
1- TYPE 9 i and using the Time interval of data 0.16672- simulation card time step 0.16673- Type 16 is connected to 99th and 100th parameter of the Type 9.
AM i doing something wrong.???--
Adnan RasheedPost-doc Research FellowKyungpook National UniversityDaegu, South Korea.+82-102762-0105
Sender notified by
Mailtrack 06/29/20, 05:45:49 PM
_______________________________________________ TRNSYS-users mailing list TRNSYS-users@lists.onebuilding.org http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/trnsys-users-onebuilding.org
-- *************************** David BRADLEY Principal Thermal Energy Systems Specialists, LLC 3 North Pinckney Street - suite 202 Madison, WI 53703 USA P:+1.608.274.2577 F:+1.608.278.1475 d.bradley@tess-inc.com http://www.tess-inc.com http://www.trnsys.com