[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [TRNSYS-users] Design of heat power in type 56 (heating manager with limited power )in an intermittent set temperature scenario



Grégoire,

  A 30% oversize on necessary heating capacity is not unusual in US HVAC design practice. I will refrain from adding personal opinions about whether this is a good practice or not. ASHRAE 90.1 suggests a 25% oversize in their Appendix G.


  You mention that you have sized the heating based on envelope losses and infiltration. Don't forget that there is also usually some fresh air that must be supplied to a space and that air must also be conditioned (ie be part of your heating capacity).

 

  The recovery time also has a good bit to do with the thermal capacity of a zone and of the delivery systems. In some work that we have done on radiant floor systems we have seen that aggressive night time setbacks are a bad idea because the thermal flywheel of the radiant floor becomes very hard to control.


kind regards,

 David



On 04/26/2017 06:48, Greg B via TRNSYS-users wrote:

Hello,


I'm currently modeling an old terraced building (construction type bricks / 8 zones / North Europa - Belgium) with a certain level of refurbishement (let's say an overall of 8cm insulation). I designed the heating power of the different zones, in the heating manger of type 56 in limited power, based on the heating losses by transmission and infiltration (design temperatures :  internal temp 20°C / external -10°C). But when I launch the simulation in winter in a intermittent set point scenario (0h-6h : 16°C 6-8h: 20°C 8h-15h :16°C 15h-22h:20°C 22h-0h :16°C) the recovery time is very high and in some cases it is not even possible to reach the high set point even after more than 8 hours.


I don't know if some of you experienced this same problem (such long recovery times)? I read in most of documentations that I have to oversize the heating power in order to have a reasonnable recovery time (let's say between 1 or 2 hours to reach the high set temperature). When I do this I have to oversize at least 30% of the original power and this seems quiet high, isn't it? Any idea or doucmentation about a such issue?


Thank you in adavance.


Best regards,


Grégoire


 



_______________________________________________
TRNSYS-users mailing list
TRNSYS-users@lists.onebuilding.org
http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/trnsys-users-onebuilding.org

-- 
***************************
David BRADLEY
Principal
Thermal Energy Systems Specialists, LLC
22 North Carroll Street - suite 370
Madison, WI  53703 USA

P:+1.608.274.2577
F:+1.608.278.1475
d.bradley@tess-inc.com

http://www.tess-inc.com
http://www.trnsys.com