[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [TRNSYS-users] connection between type 194, 48c and 47b

Sandeep,
  Integer overflow errors indicate an error in the Fortran code of a Type that isn't being handled "cleanly." In Fortran there is a maximum value for an integer variable type. You get an integer overflow if the code tries to handle an integer value greater than the maximum allowable. If you can send the project that causes the error to your TRNSYS distributor then can have a look and forward it on if needed.
kind regards,
 David


On 02/26/2016 11:16, Sandeep Singh Chahal wrote:

Hi David, 


Thanks for your answer. I have sent a request to IT help person and looking forward if he could upgrade the TRNSYS. 


Mean while I am facing integer over flow integer(error). Some times it gives this error but sometimes it does not. How I can overcome this error?  


( 2012) says I have to contact the TRNYS distributor. I am wondering do i have to do that or is there any way that I can fix it. 

Thanks, 
Sandeep Chahal




From: David BRADLEY <d.bradley@tess-inc.com>
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 8:09 AM
To: TRNSYS users mailing list at OneBuilding.org; Sandeep Singh Chahal
Subject: Re: [TRNSYS-users] connection between type 194, 48c and 47b
 
Sandeep,
 Yes, it is appropriate to connect Type194's maximum power point power to Type48 and Type47 as inputs. I would recommend that you contact your distributor to obtain the most recent TRNSYS release (17.02.0005). It contains an example of what you are trying to do. If you aren't sure who to contact then please send me an email containing the contents of your user17.id file (it can be opened with a text editor and is located in the ..\Trnsys17 folder). Please send the email directly to me and do not copy the entire list!
kind regards,
 David


On 02/25/2016 13:50, Sandeep Singh Chahal wrote:


Hello TRNSYS users,


I am trying to charge a battery bank with solar power. Following components are being used:


1. type 194 ( photovoltaic panel)

2. type 47b( battery)

c. type 48c ( controller)



Problems that I am facing


1.when I connect type 194 through type 48c(controller), battery state of charge remains zero and all other property.



can someone please clear following questions:


1. Is it appropriate to connect type 194 output: Power at maximum power point ( which is Watts converted into KJ/h)  to   type 48c as input power?


2. I am using TRNSYS 17.01.0028, is there any example with controllers and batteries.

reference : http://lists.onebuilding.org/htdig.cgi/trnsys-users-onebuilding.org/2016-January/027814.html 


3. suggestion regarding proper combination of battery, controller and PV panel?


I will greatly appreciate any help!


Sandeep Chahal 



_______________________________________________
TRNSYS-users mailing list
TRNSYS-users@lists.onebuilding.org
http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/trnsys-users-onebuilding.org


-- 
***************************
David BRADLEY
Principal
Thermal Energy Systems Specialists, LLC
22 North Carroll Street - suite 370
Madison, WI  53703 USA

P:+1.608.274.2577
F:+1.608.278.1475
d.bradley@tess-inc.com

http://www.tess-inc.com
http://www.trnsys.com

-- 
***************************
David BRADLEY
Principal
Thermal Energy Systems Specialists, LLC
22 North Carroll Street - suite 370
Madison, WI  53703 USA

P:+1.608.274.2577
F:+1.608.278.1475
d.bradley@tess-inc.com

http://www.tess-inc.com
http://www.trnsys.com