[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[TRNSYS-users] Coupling airflow (in TRNbuild) versus TRNflow

To: "trnsys-users@cae.wisc.edu" <trnsys-users@cae.wisc.edu>
Subject: [TRNSYS-users] Coupling airflow (in TRNbuild) versus TRNflow
From: kevin maiques <maiquesk@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 17:43:57 +0100
List-archive: <https://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/trnsys-users>
List-help: <mailto:trnsys-users-request@cae.wisc.edu?subject=help>
List-id: "TRNSYS users mailing list at the Solar Energy Lab, UW-Madison" <trnsys-users.cae.wisc.edu>
List-post: <mailto:trnsys-users@cae.wisc.edu>
List-subscribe: <https://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/trnsys-users>, <mailto:trnsys-users-request@cae.wisc.edu?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/trnsys-users>, <mailto:trnsys-users-request@cae.wisc.edu?subject=unsubscribe>

Dear TRNsys-users

I simulate the same flow between two zones with TRNbuild and TRNflow.
But I don't have same results.
It seems to me that the evolution of temperature is more realistic than temperature with coupling airflow of TNRbuild.

I want to know if I can continue to simulate coupling airflow with TRNbuild or not?

Best Regards.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [TRNSYS-users] Coupling airflow (in TRNbuild) versus TRNflow
  - From: David Bradley <bradley@tess-inc.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [TRNSYS-users] Help Needed with TRNSYS modeling
Next by Date: [TRNSYS-users] Did you get my invite?
Previous by thread: [TRNSYS-users] Help Needed with TRNSYS modeling
Next by thread: Re: [TRNSYS-users] Coupling airflow (in TRNbuild) versus TRNflow
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread