Hello,
I’m trying
to convert Trnsys15 types to Trnsys16 types. So I followed the instructions
from the manual:
- !DEC$ATRIBUTES
DLLEXPORT::TYPE154
INFO(12)=15
return 1 (do I really have to use return 1?)
end
if
INFO(6)=20 (value by default according to the manual)
INFO(9)=0
call SetStorageSize
call TYPECK(1,INFO,NI,NP,ND) (IOPT=1)
call RCHECK(INFO,YCHECK,OCHECK)
return 1
end
if
A=PAR(1)
. .
. .
. .
E=PAR(5)
OUT(1)=initial condition or 0
.
.
.
OUT(4)=initial condition or 0
return
1
end if
return 1
end if
return 1
end if
My problem
is that due to this conversion Trnsys mixes up the parameters for my type (Type154). I
used the debugger to find out where is the problem. Next, I landed on Proc.for
(I checked the parameters with quick watch, everything is ok) and from there I got to
Exec.for where beings the checking of every unit in my simulation, everything
is ok until I begin to check my type (written originally in Trnsys 15).
Proc.for(good
parameters)→ Exec.for (good parameters)→CallTypes.for (good
parameters)→TYPE00.for (good parameters)→TYPE154.for(mixed up
parameters)→Exec.for(good parameters)
Has anyone
had this problem before? Frankly I have no idea how to solve this.I've tried everything I could think of and nothing seems to be working.
Any help
shall be appreciated.
Mariana Ghetu
--- On Wed, 4/2/09, trnsys-users-request@cae.wisc.edu <trnsys-users-request@cae.wisc.edu> wrote:
From: trnsys-users-request@cae.wisc.edu <trnsys-users-request@cae.wisc.edu> Subject: TRNSYS-users Digest, Vol 50, Issue 8 To: trnsys-users@cae.wisc.edu Date: Wednesday, 4 February, 2009, 7:03 PM
Send TRNSYS-users mailing list submissions to trnsys-users@cae.wisc.edu
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/trnsys-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to trnsys-users-request@cae.wisc.edu
You can reach the person managing the list at trnsys-users-owner@cae.wisc.edu
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of TRNSYS-users
digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Meaning of simulation start time specified in the control card (David Bradley) 2. conductive heat flux (Marijke Steeman) 3. TrnFlow (gizmoog) 4. Units of Solar radiation (Artemi Spanaki) 5. Re: Units of Solar radiation (Cramer Silkworth)
Chun Kwong,
You have to use the correct mode of Type89 (Type89d in this case). In
TRNSYS 16, the start time is the hour of the year at the start of the
simulation (0 to start at the very beginning of the year, 1 if you want
to start on January 1 at 1AM, 744 if you want to start on February 1 at
midnight). In TRNSYS 15 it was a bit different. If you are using TRNSYS
15, let me know and I will explain in more detail.
Regards,
David
a8304506@graduate.hku.hk wrote:
Dear Trnsys users.
I try to perform a simulation by specifying a simulation start time other than 0 or 1. However, I find that the weather data read using Type89 seems to start just from the beginning of the data file no matter what simulation start time I have specified. What is then the actual meaning of this start time? If I want to start a simulation not at the beginning of a year, what should I do? Your reply is highly appreciated. Thank you!
Best Regards LEE, Chun Kwong Research assistant Division of Building Science and Technology City University of Hong Kong
_______________________________________________
TRNSYS-users mailing list
TRNSYS-users@cae.wisc.edu
https://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/trnsys-users
-- *********************************************************************** Thermal Energy System Specialists (TESS), LLC David BRADLEY 22 N. Carroll Street - Suite 370 Partner Madison, WI 53703 USA P: +1.608.274.2577 F: +1.608.278.1475 E-mail: bradley@tess-inc.com Web Pages: http://www.tess-inc.com and http://www.trnsys.com
***********************************************************************
Dear TRNSYS-users,
Does someone know if it is possible to get the
conductive heat flux
through a wall directly from TRNSYS? Or is it only
possible to consider
the total heat flux and the heat flux forom
radiation separate and then
subtract the first from the second.
Thanks in advance.
Best regards
ir-arch Marijke Steeman
Universiteit Gent Vakgroep Architectuur en
Stedebouw Onderzoeksgroep Bouwfysica en Installaties Jozef Plateaustraat
22 B- 9000 Gent tel 09 264 37 52 / fax 09 264 41 85 marijke.steeman@ugent.be
Dear users,
Does anybody knows if Trnsys 17 leads to changes in trnflow ? I’d like to get Trnflow but I don’t want to buy a new version in just a few months…
Olivier
Dear David and TRNSYS users
Thanks again for your helpful advice.
I think I found the reason that gives me strange results. I created a *.tm2 file of meteorological data using Meteonorm software. The created file gives the radiation in W/m^2. The component that reads this file (type109-TMY2), has by default the unit of solar radiation in kj/hrm^2. Have you got any idea about how can I change this, without changing the whole proforma (this is because the proforma has already a lot of changes that I don’t want to be change in this project).
Is there any way to view this *.tm2 file? (maybe another software?). I connect it with type65a, in order to view some data, but it seems to be quite different in comparison to the preview results of Meteonorm. I think that this is the reason that gives me “weird” results in my simulation.
Thank you for your helpful advices.
Best regards,
Artemi Spanaki
check out the rest of the Windows Live™.
More than mail–Windows Live™ goes way beyond your inbox.
More than messages
Artemi,
TMY2 files are just plain text files, you can open them in
Notepad. However, due to the format, they're difficult to read like that. Excel
can open them and be set up to split the data fields properly, or you can just
use a template like this one: http://sel.me.wisc.edu/trnsys/weather/tmy2.xls
Type 109 knows that the input from a TMY2 file is in W/m2, and
converts its output for kJ/hm2, you shouldn't have to change anything for it to
work properly. What exactly is the problem you're getting?
-Cramer
J. Cramer
Silkworth
Transsolar Climate
Engineering
Technical consulting for energy
efficiency and environmental quality in buildings.
145 Hudson
Street
Suite 402
New York, NY 10013
Office: 212-219-2255
silkworth@transsolar.com
Dear David and TRNSYS users
Thanks again for your helpful advice.
I think I found the reason that gives
me strange results. I created a *.tm2 file of meteorological data using
Meteonorm software. The created file gives the radiation in W/m^2. The component
that reads this file (type109-TMY2), has by default the unit of solar radiation
in kj/hrm^2. Have you got any idea about how can I change this, without changing
the whole proforma (this is because the proforma has already a lot of changes
that I don’t want to be change in this
project).
Is there any way to view this *.tm2
file? (maybe another software?). I connect it with type65a, in order to view
some data, but it seems to be quite different in comparison to the preview
results of Meteonorm. I think that this is the reason that gives me “weird”
results in my simulation.
Thank you for your helpful
advices.
Best regards,
Artemi Spanaki
check out the rest of the Windows Live™. More than mail–Windows Live™ goes way
beyond your inbox. More than messages
_______________________________________________ TRNSYS-users mailing list TRNSYS-users@cae.wisc.edu https://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/trnsys-users
|