Re: [TRNSYS-users] problem with type 109 (user+standard format)

["Matt Duffy" <duffy@tess-inc.com>]

Dear Eleni Ampatzi,

I could not see anything wrong the Ibeam and Type109.  What do you mean
that 'you will get the wrong results' with the Ibeam on surface 7?  The
Ibeam seemed nominal for that surface.



Best regards,

Matt Duffy
Technical Support Team
Thermal Energy System Specialists
2916 Marketplace Drive, Suite 104
Madison, WI  53719
608.274.2577
duffy@tess-inc.com




----- Original Message -----
From: "Eleni Ampatzi" <ampatzie@Cardiff.ac.uk>
Sent: Thu, July 31, 2008 4:32
Subject:[TRNSYS-users] problem with type 109 (user+standard format)

Dear All,

I have noticed that there is a problem with type 109. Please find attached an
example. If you try to
read the Ibeam of the surface 7 you will get wrong results. If you reset
the number
of surfaces that
the component calculates to e.g. 4 and then you reload the rest 4 and
re-connect
them with the other
components, then the output of Ibeam is correct. I do not understand the
reason
behind this. I have
24 models and I have the same problem with most of them. Any ideas? Thank
you in
advance,

Best Regards

Eleni

----- End of original message -----