Delphine, This
type of problem is best investigated in a COMIS stand-alone simulation (without
TRNSYS) first. This
way, you can better understand the airflow modelling phenomena alone (without
the influence from thermal problems) - which is actually one of the big
advantages of using this coupling (you can run the COMIS part without the
TRNSYS side - just click on the COMIS project window (*.cpf) and run a
COMIS simulation with fixed temperatures / wind / etc. Then you can easily
determine the influence of each phenomenon. At the end, go back to the coupled
simulation (.tpf) ). If
you need help on the air flow part, you can use the expertise of the quite
active COMIS user community : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/comis You
will find almost 500 COMIS users and the world's top-experts on air flow
modelling on this group. Werner
PS:
A similar group exists for CONTAM users: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CONTAM/ De :
trnsys-users-bounces@engr.wisc.edu [mailto:trnsys-users-bounces@engr.wisc.edu] De la part de OCTRUE, Delphine Hello! I try to design a double skin facade with Trnsys and
Comis.I have cut the double skin facade in 4 zones (corresponding to the 4
storeys). The double skin facade has no mecanical ventilation but
has two openings downward and upward. I don't know how modelize these
openings : I want to add a grid before the air incomming, so I use the
type "duct, entry with screen" in comis. But my simulation in trnsys
gives me very high coupling air flow (20 000 kg/h) and no infiltration
(although the % of screen is 90). I think it's not good because in
reality, there are dynamic loss which drop the airflow! Their is also no
temperature stratification. When I replace this duct with an open window, I
have more accurate results : air coupling flow with 6000kg/h (but it seems
still high), infiltration in the extremity of facade and temperature
stratification. Have somebody already worked on double skin facade? Or does
someone know why the screen gives me bad results? If you need more information, ask me. Thanks a lot for your answers Best regards Delphine
|