Re: [TRNSYS-users] doub't reg type9+type16

["Diego A. Arias" <daarias@wisc.edu>]

Dear Rajkumar,

What you are seeing is the result of the different treatment of 
instantaneous values and hourly averages in TRNSYS.  I recommend looking 
at the following discussions that have addressed this topic previously.

https://www.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/trnsys-users/2005/000828.html
https://www.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/trnsys-users/2005/000785.html
http://sel.me.wisc.edu/trnsys/mailinglist/archive1999-2002/msg00735.html

Please feel free to email me if you have more questions.
Best regards,

Diego

RAJ KUMAR wrote:

> Hi,
>  
>     I am using type9a + type 16i (GR+DR) in my building problem. After 
> simulating, If I compare Global radiation and diffuse radiation data 
> (which we fed with type9) with ouput data of GR+DR from type 16i , 
> there is change in 7th value of every day. Even I tried by changing 
> the parameter 9 in TYPE 16i (solar time?), there is variation in 7th 
> value.
>  
>      Could you please explain me?, why is it so?
>  
> regards,
> Rajkumar.S
> Research scholar,
> CES,IITdelhi.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Yahoo! Photos
> Ring in the New Year with Photo Calendars 
> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/photos/*http://pa.yahoo.com/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/photos/evt=38087/*http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph//page?.file=calendar_splash.html&.dir=>. 
> Add photos, events, holidays, whatever.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> TRNSYS-users mailing list
> TRNSYS-users@engr.wisc.edu
> https://www.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/trnsys-users
>  


--

Diego A. Arias
TRNSYS Coordinator
Solar Energy Laboratory
University of Wisconsin - Madison
1500 Engineering Drive
Madison, WI 53706