<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>        <rss version="2.0"
             xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
             xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
             xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
             xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
             xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
             xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
        <channel>
            <title>
									TRNSYS Forum - Recent Topics				            </title>
            <link>https://trnsys.org/community/</link>
            <description>TRNSYS Discussion Board</description>
            <language>en-US</language>
            <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 06:13:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
            <generator>wpForo</generator>
            <ttl>60</ttl>
							                    <item>
                        <title>Type786</title>
                        <link>https://trnsys.org/community/component-libraries-tess-libraries-transsolar-components-user-written-components/type786/</link>
                        <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 19:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Hello,
I am using Type786 and I set Control Mode = 0 (Parameter #1) to operate the heat pump as an ON/OFF unit. However, when I run the simulation, I receive the following error message:
&quot;...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="ds-markdown-paragraph">Hello,</p>
<p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span>I am using Type786 and I set Control Mode = 0 (Parameter #1) to operate the heat pump as an ON/OFF unit. However, when I run the simulation, I receive the following error message:</span></p>
<p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><em><span>"14 INPUTS are required and 16 INPUTS were specified."</span></em></p>
<p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span>I understand the reason: when Control Mode = 0, Input #15 (heating mode supply air temperature setpoint) and Input #16 (cooling mode supply air temperature setpoint) are not needed. These two inputs are only relevant when Control Mode = 1 (variable speed operation). </span></p>
<p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span>My question is: is there a way to disable or deactivate Input #15 and Input #16 when Control Mode = 0, without having to modify the source code or the ProForma file? I am looking for a standard, user-level solution.</span></p>
<p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"> </p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://trnsys.org/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>yalikara</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://trnsys.org/community/component-libraries-tess-libraries-transsolar-components-user-written-components/type786/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Type786 - Different number of air flow rate steps for heating and cooling</title>
                        <link>https://trnsys.org/community/standard-forum/type786-different-number-of-air-flow-rate-steps-for-heating-and-cooling/</link>
                        <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 18:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Type786 requires the same number of air flow rate steps for both heating and cooling performance data files. I have manufacturer data (Goodman) with 4 flow rate steps for cooling, but for he...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span>Type786 requires the same number of air flow rate steps for both heating and cooling performance data files. I have manufacturer data (Goodman) with 4 flow rate steps for cooling, but for heating the table  provides only one flow rate.</span></p>
<p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span>What do you recommend?</span></p>
<ol start="1">
<li>
<p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span>Use only the cooling rating flow rate (1160 CFM) for both modes (single step each)?</span></p>
</li>
<li>
<p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span>Copy the single heating flow rate 4 times to match the 4 cooling steps?</span></p>
</li>
</ol>
<p class="ds-markdown-paragraph"><span>Thanks.</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://trnsys.org/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>yalikara</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://trnsys.org/community/standard-forum/type786-different-number-of-air-flow-rate-steps-for-heating-and-cooling/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Modeling a two-way valve</title>
                        <link>https://trnsys.org/community/component-libraries-tess-libraries-transsolar-components-user-written-components/modeling-a-two-way-valve/</link>
                        <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 12:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Hi,
I would like to model a heating circuit in a building, with a single-speed pump (type 114) and a valve that is connected to a PID-controller. The valve should modulate the flow rate in ...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I would like to model a heating circuit in a building, with a single-speed pump (type 114) and a valve that is connected to a PID-controller. The valve should modulate the flow rate in the circuit, based on the control signal from the PID-controller. What is the easiest way to model this? I have not found a valve type appropriate for this purpose. Is it best to use a valve+single-speed pump, or is it easier to use a variable-speed pump instead? If I use the single-speed pump, will the flow rate be affected by a valve, or will it always keep the same, constant flow rate?</p>
<p>Best regards,</p>
<p>Johan</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://trnsys.org/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>jolind</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://trnsys.org/community/component-libraries-tess-libraries-transsolar-components-user-written-components/modeling-a-two-way-valve/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>SketchUp to TRNBuild import issue</title>
                        <link>https://trnsys.org/community/modeling-buildings-in-trnsys-trnsys3d-trnbuild-type-56/sketchup-to-trnbuild-import-issue/</link>
                        <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 14:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Hello everyone,I’m trying to model a simple zone using SketchUp and then import it into TRNBuild, but I’m running into an issue.Here’s what I did:-Created a simple parallelepiped geometry in...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello everyone,<br />I’m trying to model a simple zone using SketchUp and then import it into TRNBuild, but I’m running into an issue.<br />Here’s what I did:<br />-Created a simple parallelepiped geometry in SketchUp<br />-Exported the model as an *.idf file<br />-Imported the file into TRNBuild<br /><br />After importing, the zone appears to exist, and I can see 9 walls listed (not 6). However, all the surface areas are showing as 0 m².<br />I’ve attached screenshots for reference.<br />Has anyone encountered this issue before or knows what might be causing it? Any help would be greatly appreciated!<br />Thank you in advance.</p>
<p>Mariem</p>
<div id="wpfa-477" class="wpforo-attached-file"><a class="wpforo-default-attachment" href="//trnsys.org/wp-content/uploads/wpforo/default_attachments/1775226364-TRNBUILD.jpg" target="_blank" title="TRNBUILD.jpg"><i class="fas fa-paperclip"></i>&nbsp;TRNBUILD.jpg</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://trnsys.org/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>Mariem S</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://trnsys.org/community/modeling-buildings-in-trnsys-trnsys3d-trnbuild-type-56/sketchup-to-trnbuild-import-issue/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Fortran Compiler</title>
                        <link>https://trnsys.org/community/component-libraries-tess-libraries-transsolar-components-user-written-components/fortran-compiler/</link>
                        <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 16:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Dear TRNSYS users,
I was using Intel Fortran (Ifort 2022) with Visual Studio 2019 for developing and debugging Types, and everything was fine. But I changed my computer and this solution is...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear TRNSYS users,</p>
<p>I was using Intel Fortran (Ifort 2022) with Visual Studio 2019 for developing and debugging Types, and everything was fine. But I changed my computer and this solution is no longer available. </p>
<p>As far as I know, there is no debugging options with Type Studio, and TRNSYS 18 is not compatible with the new Intel Fortran compiler (Ifx).</p>
<p>What is now the best solution to debug user written types ?</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Philippe</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://trnsys.org/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>Papillon</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://trnsys.org/community/component-libraries-tess-libraries-transsolar-components-user-written-components/fortran-compiler/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Window frame</title>
                        <link>https://trnsys.org/community/modeling-buildings-in-trnsys-trnsys3d-trnbuild-type-56/window-frame/</link>
                        <pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2026 00:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Hi everyone,
What is the best way to model the window frame?
I remind these recommendation reported in manuals/slides, which appear to be contradictory:

It is better to model the window...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone,</p>
<p data-start="0" data-end="40">What is the best way to model the window frame?</p>
<p data-start="0" data-end="40">I remind these recommendation reported in manuals/slides, <span>which appear to be contradictory</span>:</p>
<ul>
<li class="p1">It is better to model the window frame as a Wall and set FFRAME = 0.</li>
<li>the frame should be defined in TRNBuild (see slide attached)</li>
</ul>
<p data-start="42" data-end="288">Does “model the window frame as a Wall” mean that the frame has to be modelled in SketchUp/TRNSYS3D and then assigned the construction type Wall in TRNBuild, while the window frame fraction of the window, again in TRNBuild, should be set to 0?</p>
<p data-start="42" data-end="288"><span>If drawing the frame in SketchUp/TRNSYS3D is indeed necessary, what is the correct way to do it geometrically? I understand that it should obviously not be modelled as shown in the slide where the framed window is marked as “Doesn’t work in TRNSYS,” but I am unsure what the recommended workflow is.</span></p>
<p data-start="42" data-end="288"> </p>
<p data-start="42" data-end="288">I sincerely thank you in advance for your support</p>
<p data-start="42" data-end="288">Warm Regards,</p>
<p data-start="42" data-end="288">Silvia</p>
<div id="wpfa-476" class="wpforo-attached-file"><a class="wpforo-default-attachment" href="//trnsys.org/wp-content/uploads/wpforo/default_attachments/1774745272-slide.png" target="_blank" title="slide.png"><i class="fas fa-paperclip"></i>&nbsp;slide.png</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://trnsys.org/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>SilviaC</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://trnsys.org/community/modeling-buildings-in-trnsys-trnsys3d-trnbuild-type-56/window-frame/</guid>
                    </item>
							        </channel>
        </rss>
		
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: trnsys.org @ 2026-04-20 06:13:55 by W3 Total Cache
-->