If you assume that the cavity has a very high infiltration rate (which seems to be the case here) and you can accept the assumption that radiative transfer with the ground is negligible, a simpler option would be to remove the cavity from the model.
The floor above the cavity would become an outside surface, you would just have to make sure it does not receive solar radiation. You can do that by forcing its exterior absorptance to 0 or by defining a special orientation for which you do not use automatic solar radiation calculation in Type 56 (and you leave the inputs unconnected with constant 0 value). You could also define that outside surface as a boundary wall with a boundary temperature equal to the ambient temperature.
This is (I think) acceptable if the floor is reasonably well insulated, so that the assumption on the cavity temperature has a minor impact on the model. One advantage is that it saves you from having to use a ground coupling model.
Of course, if you are specifically interested in what is happening in the cavity, then David’s suggestion to model it as a zone and to model infiltration (rather than assuming a constant rate) is what I would choose. And I think you would have to add a ground coupling model, to be consistent with the level of detail in the rest of the model.
Michaël Kummert
Polytechnique Montréal
From: David BRADLEY via TRNSYS-users <trnsys-users@lists.onebuilding.org>
Sent: June 11, 2021 10:33
To: TRNSYS users mailing list at OneBuilding.org <trnsys-users@lists.onebuilding.org>
Cc: David BRADLEY <d.bradley@tess-inc.com>
Subject: Re: [TRNSYS-users] How to model a cavity zone under a building
Seyedmostafa,
You're on the right track. At least your method is the same that I used when I was modeling a similar situation. In my case there was a thin vinyl skirt around the building so I used its thermal resistance for my massless walls. I think the way to assess the infiltration into the cavity is to couple the Type56 thermal model either with CONTAM (using Type97 or Type98) or with TRNFlow. Both are designed to estimate airflow between pressure nodes in buildings.
kind regards,
David
On 06/11/2021 05:06, Seyedmostafa Mousavi via TRNSYS-users wrote:
Hi all,
Hope you are very well.
I’m modelling a cabin in SketchUp using the TRNSYS3D plugin. In the real cabin structure, several steel posts were used to elevate the cabin and separate its floor from the ground. The air easily flows in this cavity under the cabin, see Fig. 1. To model the cavity, I’ve considered a bottom zone in which the walls were defined as Massless Layers with R-value of 0.044 h m^2 K/ kJ (equal to the air gap), see Fig. 2.
However, I’m not sure if this modelling process is correct. Do we have any option in TRNSYS to consider such cavity under buildings?
BTW, if this model is correct, how should I calculate the infiltration rate for the cavity section? Any idea is highly appreciated.
Thanks a lot for your help.
Warmly,
Seyedmostafa Mousavi
The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010 Australia
E: sm.mousavi@unimelb.edu.au
_______________________________________________
TRNSYS-users mailing list
TRNSYS-users@lists.onebuilding.org
http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/trnsys-users-onebuilding.org
--
***************************
David BRADLEY
Principal
Thermal Energy Systems Specialists, LLC
3 North Pinckney Street - suite 202
Madison, WI 53703 USA
P:+1.608.274.2577
d.bradley@tess-inc.com
http://www.tess-inc.com
http://www.trnsys.com