Dear Marion,
Thanks for your email.
As you can see from the screenshots in my previous email, I didn’t change the U-value of windows. What I did is:
I created those windows using the WINDOW program (exactly followed the official tutorials) and modified the information in TRNSYS folders according.
You mentioned Type56 wouldn’t use SHGC value for the calculation but, is there any reason that the internal load changes when the visible light transmittance (VLT) changes (meanwhile other parameters of the window
are not changed)? Because I think the variation of VLT has very limited influence on the internal loads of the space, but how come in my case the load changed as the VLT changed.
Many thanks!
Best regards.
Siliang
From: TRNSYS-users <trnsys-users-bounces@lists.onebuilding.org>
On Behalf Of Marion Hiller via TRNSYS-users
Sent: Monday, 25 March 2019 6:58 PM
To: TRNSYS users mailing list at OneBuilding.org <trnsys-users@lists.onebuilding.org>
Cc: Marion Hiller <Hiller@Transsolar.com>
Subject: Re: [TRNSYS-users] Does TRNSYS actually take the SHGC into account for the load calculation?
Dear Siliang,
Did you change the u-value only or did you generate a new glazing properties with window?
Type 56 doesn’t use the g-value for the simulation, it is displayed only for selecting a window.
Further information on the window modeling is found in Trnsys documentation of Type 56.
Marion
Von: TRNSYS-users <trnsys-users-bounces@lists.onebuilding.org>
Im Auftrag von Siliang Yang via TRNSYS-users
Gesendet: Montag, 25. März 2019 08:00
An: TRNSYS users mailing list at OneBuilding.org <trnsys-users@lists.onebuilding.org>
Cc: Siliang Yang <siliang.yang@unsw.edu.au>
Betreff: [TRNSYS-users] Does TRNSYS actually take the SHGC into account for the load calculation?
Dear colleagues,
I am trying to analyse how the heating/cooling load of the space will be influenced by varying the solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC) of the external window. I created groups of windows as follows:
As you can see, the SHGC (g-value) was gradually changed while the visible light transmittance (VLT) was identical for each group of windows. From the physics point of view, the internal load should be changed
as the change of SHGC. However, refer to my TRNSYS simulation results (see the following screenshot), the internal load did not change with the change of SHGC value while the VLT value was constant. It seems like the load will change as the VLT changes which
is not related to the SHGC at all.
I don’t think those are reasonable results and I’ve carefully checked my TRNSYS models for sure the models were correct. That will be very appreciated if anyone might point out the seasons for the issue of my
case.
Thank you so much!
Best regards,
Siliang
Siliang Yang
PhD Candidate and Casual Academic, UNSW Built Environment
Room 6007, Red Centre West Wing
UNSW AUSTRALIA
UNSW SYDNEY NSW 2052 AUSTRALIA
T:+ 61 (2) 9385 6372 M: 0415 680 589
CRICOS Provider Code 00098G
Follow us:
This email and any attachment(s) transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) and may contain information that
is confidential or subject to legal privilege. If you receive this email in error, please disregard the contents of the email and attachment(s), delete them and notify the sender immediately. Please note that any copying, distribution or use of this email
is prohibited. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly, and with authority, states them to be the view of The University of New South Wales. Before opening any attachments, please check for
viruses. UNSW ABN 57 195 873 179..
Think Green: Please consider the environment before printing this email.