[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [TRNSYS-users] Persistent questioning about window definition



Hi Pauline Gelin,

 

I realised that your question seems to be still open.

Without knowing what you compare it is hard to explain any difference.

If you need further advise you may send an example showing the difference to hotline@transsolar.com.

 

 

Does anyone know where does this difference come from?

What values ​​of Uframe, and percentage frame and spacer, does TRNBUILD consider : those entries in the database glazings or those filled in the database window that is created for each project?

 

The frame data isn’t read from the window database at all.

 

The "edge" is a 2.5in (63.5mm) wide band at glass periphery;  

The thermal data of the edge can be selected at the window type manager of TRNbuild. If the option „ID spacer = 0“ is selected the data from the

window database is used.

Marion

 

Dipl.-Ing. Marion Hiller

 

Transsolar Energietechnik GmbH

Curiestraße 2

70563 Stuttgart
Telefon: +49 711 67976-0
http://www.trnsys.de

 

Transsolar: KlimaEngineering- Technologien für energieeffizientes Bauen und Nutzerkomfort in Gebäuden

Stuttgart – München – New York – Paris

Geschäftsführer :Diplom-Ingenieur Matthias Schuler, Diplom-Ingenieur Thomas Auer, Diplom-Physiker Stefan Holst, Diplom-Betriebswirt Dieter Schnelle

Eingetragen beim Amtsgericht Stuttgart HRB 23347,

Steuernummer: 99073/00911,USt-IdNr.: DE 152272639

 


Von: trnsys-users-bounces@cae.wisc.edu [mailto:trnsys-users-bounces@cae.wisc.edu] Im Auftrag von Pauline GELIN
Gesendet: Montag, 27. Mai 2013 14:43
An: trnsys-users
Betreff: [TRNSYS-users] Persistent questioning about window definition

 

Hello,

 

Sorry to insist but I am really blocked by these questions of data. I am not at all sure of the TRNSYS simulations.

Are there no one else who has met these misunderstandings?

 

 

Pauline GELIN

Ingénieur Conception environnementale

 

cid:image004.jpg@01CE062A.F4C2C000

 

cid:image006.jpg@01CE062A.F4C2C000

10 avenue des canuts

69120 VAULX EN VELIN

T : 04.37.45.33.33 

 

Ligne directe : 04.37.45.33.47

 

www.katene.coop

www.quadriplus-groupe.com

www.woopa.coop

 

De : Pauline GELIN
Envoyé : jeudi 23 mai 2013 09:49
À : trnsys-users
Objet : Persistent questioning about window definition

 

Hi,

 

Then I used a glass that I had created from WINDOW6 software, it turned out that the Uwin value, given output by TRNBUILD and used in the simulations, did not correspond to what I expected, result due to the Ug value from database and percentage frame  and Uframe filled in TRNBUILD.

After many tests, it appears that the calculated Uwin TRNBUILD differs if I take a glazing created in WINDOW6, for which I have not information of spacer and, or a glazing initially given in the TRNBUILD database.

While Uframe percentage and spacer values indicated in my database windows are the same.

 

Does anyone know where does this difference come from?

What values ​​of Uframe, and percentage frame and spacer, does TRNBUILD consider : those entries in the database glazings or those filled in the database window that is created for each project?

 

This misunderstanding about the values ​​considered by TRNBUILD is not at all reassuring.

Especially when I tested a window created with WINDOW6 and one from  the initial TRNBUILD database with 100% glass (so without frame).

And in the first case I found a Uwin value equal to 0.3 instead of Ug equal to 1.07.

And in the second case I found a Uwin value of 1.22 for the same value of Ug equal to 1.07.

 

Thanks a lot in advance for all your answers.

 

Best regards,

 

Pauline GELIN

Ingénieur Conception environnementale

 

cid:image004.jpg@01CE062A.F4C2C000

 

cid:image006.jpg@01CE062A.F4C2C000

10 avenue des canuts

69120 VAULX EN VELIN

T : 04.37.45.33.33 

 

Ligne directe : 04.37.45.33.47

 

www.katene.coop

www.quadriplus-groupe.com

www.woopa.coop

 

De : Marion Hiller [mailto:hiller@transsolar.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 18 mai 2012 08:49
À : Pauline GELIN
Cc : trnsys-users
Objet : AW: Re: [TRNSYS-users] problem of windows and layers definitions

 

Dear Pauline,

 

I had a quick look at your questions.

 

 

Concerning the definition of a window, we would like to know if Ug presented in the library already includes convective heat transfer coefficients (if so what value?) and the standard to which it is calculated ?

 

è     The Ug values presented in the German library related to products are the values you can find in the catalog.
This means including including convective + radiative heat transfer coefficients and are in general measuered under test condition
acc. to a standard. The values are shown such that the user can select a glass according to published properties.
These values are NOT used during the simulation! Type 56 uses the pane, gap properties as well as the pacer and frame properties
AND the real temperature conditions to calculate heat transfer through the window.

 

Best,

 

Marion

 

 

 

Dipl.-Ing. Marion Hiller

TRANSSOLAR: KlimaEngineering - Technologien für energieeffizientes Bauen und Nutzerkomfort in Gebäude

Munich - New York - Stuttgart + 49.711.67976.0

 

Transsolar Energietechnik GmbH, Curiestrasse 2, 70563 Stuttgart

Amtsgericht Stuttgart - HRB 23347, Steuernummer 99073/00911, USt-IdNr.: DE152272639

Geschäftsführer: Dipl.Ing. Matthias Schuler, Dipl.Ing. Thomas Auer, Dipl.Phys. Stefan Holst, Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Bleicher

 

 

 

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Pauline GELIN [mailto:p.gelin@katene.fr]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. Mai 2012 16:38
An: David BRADLEY; Matt Duffy <duffy@tess-inc.com> (duffy@tess-inc.com); trnsys-users (trnsys-users@cae.wisc.edu)
Cc: Vincent MORELLE; Amélie MARILLER
Betreff: Re: [TRNSYS-users] problem of windows and layers definitions

 

_______________________________________________

TRNSYS-users mailing list

TRNSYS-users@cae.wisc.edu

https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/trnsys-users