Hi Jeff, You are definitely right that there are spikes in the power plot that complements the spike in the COP. Using the same performance map, and running at known conditions, the model is actually predicting the expected results.
The problem arises when I try to run the chiller at part load, in this case, the chiller is actually running at half of its capacity. The spikes observed were not present when the chiller was made to run at its full capacity. I would like to expand the discussion by bringing in the Entering Condenser Water Temperature (ECWT) VS the COP.
According to the default chiller performance map, as the ECWT is lowered, the COP ratio of the Chiller will increase, all other parameters kept constant.
In the attached file, the first picture COP VS ECWT ,shows the reverse instead, when the ECWT Is lowered, the COP of the Chiller decreases.
In the second picture, when I ramp down the fan speed of the cooling tower further, and hence increasing the ECWT, the COP of the chiller stabilized.
Does anyone knows why is such relationship being observed ? Or is there be a fundamental mistake in my understanding of the program ? Best Regards, Yeo
From: trnsys-users-bounces@cae.wisc.edu [mailto:trnsys-users-bounces@cae.wisc.edu]
On Behalf Of Jeff Thornton Well if you look carefully at your plots, power is not "almost constant". Change the scale of the power plot and you'll see the spikes that you are observing in your COP. Have you spot-checked your performance map by running the chiller at "known conditions"
and seeing that you're getting out of your model what you are expecting? Jeff --- Jeff Thornton President - TESS LLC 22 N. Carroll Street, Madison WI USA 53703 Office: (608) 274-2577 Fax: (608) 278-1475 E-Mail: thornton@tess-inc.com On 03/26/2013 10:44 pm, #YEO KEAT KEE# wrote:
|
Attachment:
COP VS ECWT.jpg
Description: COP VS ECWT.jpg
Attachment:
COP VS ECWT_2.jpg
Description: COP VS ECWT_2.jpg