Wang,
There has been a debate about this question in the industry for
some time. I think the consensus is that the dimensions of the room
should be taken from wall center to wall center and from the top of
one floor to the top of the next floor. If I am reading your case
correctly, I think the areas should be based on the dimensions 9.1,
7.1, and 3.1m
Regards,
David
On 11/5/2012 05:31, 王洋 wrote:
Dear all,
I have a small question for Wall/Area definition in TRNBuild using
TRNSYS 16.
What does Wall/Area exact definition in TRNBuild mean? Does its
area include the thickness of wall or not? i.e. How do we
calculate wall's area in TRNBuild? If the netto room volume was
9*7*3 m3 (length*width*height), the gross was 9.2*7.2*3.2 m3, the
Area of floor/ceiling should be 9*7 m2 or 9.2*7.2 m2?
Thanks!
Br.
wang
2012/11/3 <trnsys-users-request@cae.wisc.edu>
Send TRNSYS-users mailing list submissions to
trnsys-users@cae.wisc.edu
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/trnsys-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
trnsys-users-request@cae.wisc.edu
You can reach the person managing the list at
trnsys-users-owner@cae.wisc.edu
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
specific
than "Re: Contents of TRNSYS-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Type 15 with high latitude (Matt Duffy)
---------- 已转发邮件 ----------
From: Matt Duffy <duffy@tess-inc.com>
To: <trnsys-users@cae.wisc.edu>
Cc:
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:42:51 -0500
Subject: Re: [TRNSYS-users] Type 15 with high latitude
Dear Laurent Georges,
This should not be an issue now with the latest version,
17.01.0025. Please make sure that you are using this
version, and if you continue to have problems, please send
me the *.tpf.
Thank you,
Matt Duffy
On 2012-11-01 05:59, Laurent Georges wrote:
Dear TRNSYS users,
When using the Type15 to read
the Meteonorm weather file of a location at high
latitude (e.g. Tromsø in Norway), the simulation
stops with the following error in middle of the
summer period : “An simulation time step is
greater than the data time step for the radiation
calculation. The simulation time step needs to be
reduced.” This error only occurs if the
simulation time step is taken lower than 1h, and the
reduction of the time step does not prevent the
simulation to crash. Does someone has an experience
with that? Is there a way to fix the problem? I am
using TRNSYS 17.
In
advance, thank you,
Best
regards,
Laurent
Georges
_______________________________________________
TRNSYS-users mailing list
TRNSYS-users@cae.wisc.edu
https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/trnsys-users
_______________________________________________
TRNSYS-users mailing list
TRNSYS-users@cae.wisc.edu
https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/trnsys-users
--
***************************
David BRADLEY
Principal
Thermal Energy Systems Specialists, LLC
22 North Carroll Street - suite 370
Madison, WI 53703 USA
P:+1.608.274.2577
F:+1.608.278.1475
d.bradley@tess-inc.com
http://www.tess-inc.com
http://www.trnsys.com
|