[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[TRNSYS-users] Transition from Trnsys 16 to Trnsys 17

To: Trnsys discussion group <trnsys-users@engr.wisc.edu>
Subject: [TRNSYS-users] Transition from Trnsys 16 to Trnsys 17
From: a8304506@graduate.hku.hk
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:09:05 +0800
List-archive: <http://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/trnsys-users>
List-help: <mailto:trnsys-users-request@cae.wisc.edu?subject=help>
List-id: "TRNSYS users mailing list at the Solar Energy Lab, UW-Madison" <trnsys-users.cae.wisc.edu>
List-post: <mailto:trnsys-users@cae.wisc.edu>
List-subscribe: <https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/trnsys-users>, <mailto:trnsys-users-request@cae.wisc.edu?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/options/trnsys-users>, <mailto:trnsys-users-request@cae.wisc.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2

Hello, everyone.

We get some problems with the Compaq Visual Fortran, and we want to shift to
Intel Visual Fortran.  We would like to know if Trnsys 17 is adapted to IVF? 
We read a documentation about the new feature of Trnsys 17.1.  It mentions that
the format of the component code has been modified which eliminates the use of
the INFO array.  If so, should I need to re-write all the component codes that
I have created before in Trnsys 16?  Please advise.  Thank you!

Best Regards
LEE, Chun Kwong
Department of Mechanical Engineering
University of Hong Kong

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [TRNSYS-users] Transition from Trnsys 16 to Trnsys 17
  - From: <marcello.caciolo@cofelyaxima-gdfsuez.com>

Prev by Date: [TRNSYS-users] Type 927 WWHP
Next by Date: Re: [TRNSYS-users] Transition from Trnsys 16 to Trnsys 17
Previous by thread: [TRNSYS-users] Type 927 WWHP
Next by thread: Re: [TRNSYS-users] Transition from Trnsys 16 to Trnsys 17
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread