[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [TRNSYS-users] TRNSYS-users Digest, Vol 93, Issue 36



Robert,
 There is not a way to directly transfer an IES VE model to TRNSYS. However, using loads generated by IES and imposing them on a TRNSYS system is fairly simple. To do so, you make use of one of two models that are available in the TESS Loads and Structures library: Type682 for imposing loads onto a liquid flow stream or Type693 for imposing loads on an air stream.  In so doing, you unfortunately lose the interaction between load and system.
Best,
 David



On 9/25/2012 11:34, Robert Burzynski wrote:
Hi

Is it possible to somehow transfer models of buildings from IES VE project to TRNSYS
or how to connect heat demands generated by IES to TRNSYS as heat loads.
Kind regards,

Robert Burzynski
Research Engineer
Zero Carbon House Project - Technologies for Sustainable Built Environments (TSBE)
University of Reading (UoR) in collaboration with Scottish and Southern Energy (SSE)
M. 07928281876



On 25 September 2012 15:26, <trnsys-users-request@cae.wisc.edu> wrote:
Send TRNSYS-users mailing list submissions to
        trnsys-users@cae.wisc.edu

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/trnsys-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        trnsys-users-request@cae.wisc.edu

You can reach the person managing the list at
        trnsys-users-owner@cae.wisc.edu

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of TRNSYS-users digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. Debugging TRNSYS using Microsoft Visual Studio 2010
      (Farah, Sleiman - farsy019)
   2.  equation length limit (Jean Marais)
   3. mismatch between type 30a and type99 (Santeri Siren)


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Farah, Sleiman - farsy019" <sleiman.farah@mymail.unisa.edu.au>
To: "trnsys-users@cae.wisc.edu" <trnsys-users@cae.wisc.edu>
Cc: 
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:06:23 +0000
Subject: [TRNSYS-users] Debugging TRNSYS using Microsoft Visual Studio 2010

Dear all,

 

I created a component (type165) in TRNSYS 16 under windows 7 using Microsoft Visual Studio 2010. This component (solar collector) is connected to a weather data reader, pump, and hot water storage tank. In the simulation studio, the simulation stalls at a specific time without any error message. I believe that the simulation is not able to converge at that time which is making TRNSYS irresponsive. I have been trying to debug the component, however an error message {Unable to start program ‘C:\Program Files\Trnsys16\UserLib\ReleaseDLLs\Type165Lib.dll’} keeps popping up in Microsoft Visual Studio as soon as F5 (debug) is clicked. The file (Type165Lib.dll) do exist in that directory.

 

Any suggestion how to make the debugging possible is highly appreciated.

 

Regards,

 

Sleiman



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jean Marais <jeannieboef@gmail.com>
To: David BRADLEY <d.bradley@tess-inc.com>, TRNSYS-users@cae.wisc.edu
Cc: 
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:59:53 +0200
Subject: [TRNSYS-users] equation length limit
Dear Group,
What is the limit on the length of an equation? eg. a = b + c + d + ... + xxx
Is it limited to "string length" or number of terms or what?
Regards,
Jean


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Santeri Siren <santeri.siren1@gmail.com>
To: "trnsys käyttäjät" <trnsys-users@cae.wisc.edu>
Cc: 
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:25:57 +0300
Subject: [TRNSYS-users] mismatch between type 30a and type99
Hello all,

I am trying to use type 30a to model collector array shading on my PV panel rows. I ran some test simulations and there seems to be a mismatch between type 30a and weather data file in the total radiation that reaches the surface.

I set the following parameters to type 30 and to type 99 (weather data):

- slope of surface = 45
- azimuth angle of surface = 0

also in type 30:

-slope of field = 0

Then I set the row separation in type 30 to value 100 m. (there should be no shading between PV arrays)

When I log the total radiation on surface from type 30 and type 99 there is a mismatch. The radiation level of type 30 is always a little lower than in the type 99. Does anyone know how this is possible? have I possibly made wrong connections?

Best regards. Santeri Siren
_______________________________________________
TRNSYS-users mailing list
TRNSYS-users@cae.wisc.edu
https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/trnsys-users




_______________________________________________
TRNSYS-users mailing list
TRNSYS-users@cae.wisc.edu
https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/trnsys-users

-- 
***************************
David BRADLEY
Principal
Thermal Energy Systems Specialists, LLC
22 North Carroll Street - suite 370
Madison, WI  53703 USA

P:+1.608.274.2577
F:+1.608.278.1475
d.bradley@tess-inc.com

http://www.tess-inc.com
http://www.trnsys.com