[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[TRNSYS-users] whole number of simulation start time

To: "trnsys-users@cae.wisc.edu" <trnsys-users@cae.wisc.edu>
Subject: [TRNSYS-users] whole number of simulation start time
From: Simon Binnemans <simon.binnemans@khk.be>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:00:31 +0000
Accept-language: nl-NL, nl-BE, en-US
List-archive: <http://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/trnsys-users>
List-help: <mailto:trnsys-users-request@cae.wisc.edu?subject=help>
List-id: "TRNSYS users mailing list at the Solar Energy Lab, UW-Madison" <trnsys-users.cae.wisc.edu>
List-post: <mailto:trnsys-users@cae.wisc.edu>
List-subscribe: <https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/trnsys-users>, <mailto:trnsys-users-request@cae.wisc.edu?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/options/trnsys-users>, <mailto:trnsys-users-request@cae.wisc.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: Ac1SpyJsEXRtZo3PRrCBo8ZZQhSDOg==
Thread-topic: whole number of simulation start time

Dear Trnsys user,

When I start a simulation and I do not set the simulation start time to a whole number (not hour 1 but hour 1.1 for example) I get very strange simulation results.

Attached I did a basic simulation where you can see the problem by comparing the simulation results with a start time of 0 hour and a start time of 0.1 hour for example.

Does anyone know if it is always necessary to set the simulation start hour to a whole number?

Thank you for your help,

Simon Binnemans

Attachment: STARTTIMETEST.rar
Description: STARTTIMETEST.rar

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [TRNSYS-users] whole number of simulation start time
  - From: David BRADLEY <d.bradley@tess-inc.com>

Prev by Date: [TRNSYS-users] From Energy To Power
Next by Date: [TRNSYS-users] Dynamic efficiency of solar collector
Previous by thread: [TRNSYS-users] From Energy To Power
Next by thread: Re: [TRNSYS-users] whole number of simulation start time
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread