[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[TRNSYS-users] massive buildings

To: TRNSYS-users@cae.wisc.edu
Subject: [TRNSYS-users] massive buildings
From: Eunice Vilaverde Fontão <dec07001@fe.up.pt>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:40:01 +0000
List-archive: <https://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/trnsys-users>
List-help: <mailto:trnsys-users-request@cae.wisc.edu?subject=help>
List-id: "TRNSYS users mailing list at the Solar Energy Lab, UW-Madison" <trnsys-users.cae.wisc.edu>
List-post: <mailto:trnsys-users@cae.wisc.edu>
List-subscribe: <https://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/trnsys-users>, <mailto:trnsys-users-request@cae.wisc.edu?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/trnsys-users>, <mailto:trnsys-users-request@cae.wisc.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Dynamic Internet Messaging Program (DIMP) H3 (1.1)

Dear all

I am working with massive buildings and it is been difficult to relatethe results from trnsys with others simulation tools because of thebig difference among them.


I need this comparison to validate a model for other studies.

I have two questions:

1. Which is the best way to simulate a heavy wall? Is divining themassive part in many layers or creating a fictive mass less layer?

2. How can I know ( for comparing purposes ) the amount of the totalgains that are being useful to the simulation.


All tips are welcome, thanks.

Eunice

Prev by Date: [TRNSYS-users] massive buildings
Next by Date: [TRNSYS-users] massive buildings
Previous by thread: [TRNSYS-users] massive buildings
Next by thread: [TRNSYS-users] massive buildings
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread