[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [TRNSYS-users] FW: Is this a bug of Type 109-user?

To: trnsys-users@engr.wisc.edu
Subject: Re: [TRNSYS-users] FW: Is this a bug of Type 109-user?
From: David Garcia <garciamdavid@uniovi.es>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:20:49 +0200
List-archive: <https://www.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/trnsys-users>
List-help: <mailto:trnsys-users-request@engr.wisc.edu?subject=help>
List-id: "TRNSYS users mailing list at the Solar Energy Lab, UW-Madison" <trnsys-users.engr.wisc.edu>
List-post: <mailto:trnsys-users@engr.wisc.edu>
List-subscribe: <https://www.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/trnsys-users>, <mailto:trnsys-users-request@engr.wisc.edu?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/trnsys-users>, <mailto:trnsys-users-request@engr.wisc.edu?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: AcdwYfis3VGgAEXvQLOy+Dbr6GD9FQ==

Dear Jianhua,

I have tried the example you talked about and I have the same problem when changing the simulation time step and the simulation start and stop time. I am using version 16.01.0002.

The graph shows the result I have obtained.

I hope this could help you in solving the problem.

Regards,

David.

Prev by Date: [TRNSYS-users] FW: Is this a bug of Type 109-user?
Next by Date: Re: [TRNSYS-users] Exporting file
Previous by thread: [TRNSYS-users] FW: Is this a bug of Type 109-user?
Next by thread: [TRNSYS-users] TRNSED application with Type56
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread