[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[TRNSYS-users] intel visual fortran 9.1

To: TRNSYS USER <trnsys-users@engr.wisc.edu>
Subject: [TRNSYS-users] intel visual fortran 9.1
From: mohammad abdunnabi <moh_jum@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 06:22:50 -0700 (PDT)
List-archive: <https://www.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/trnsys-users>
List-help: <mailto:trnsys-users-request@engr.wisc.edu?subject=help>
List-id: "TRNSYS users mailing list at the Solar Energy Lab, UW-Madison" <trnsys-users.engr.wisc.edu>
List-post: <mailto:trnsys-users@engr.wisc.edu>
List-subscribe: <https://www.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/trnsys-users>, <mailto:trnsys-users-request@engr.wisc.edu?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/trnsys-users>, <mailto:trnsys-users-request@engr.wisc.edu?subject=unsubscribe>

Dear Diego
Dear TRNSYS user
 
I've update my Trnsys 16 to 16.01, and I have tried to follow the new structure of rebuild TRNdll.dll (section 8.4.11).however  still getting error. I have tried imitate the same procedure with new solution name (TEST) also i get errors and warning which is listed in the attached file.
in fact, it seems to me very difficult, and this is might return to my lack of knowledge about the structure of visual FORTRAN compiler (solution, projects and files). Does the new component which I'm going to produced or modify should be incorporated into all trnsys source codes to be compiled and linked together and checked for compatibility. and if you know any source that might helps me to understand these issue please let me know.
 
many thanks 
 
M. Abdunnabi

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [TRNSYS-users] intel visual fortran 9.1
  - From: "Diego A. Arias" <daarias@wisc.edu>

Prev by Date: [TRNSYS-users] Cold bridge effect with boundary conditions
Next by Date: Re: [TRNSYS-users] intel visual fortran 9.1
Previous by thread: [TRNSYS-users] Cold bridge effect with boundary conditions
Next by thread: Re: [TRNSYS-users] intel visual fortran 9.1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread