[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[TRNSYS-users] Problem with type 696b

To: trnsys-users@engr.wisc.edu
Subject: [TRNSYS-users] Problem with type 696b
From: "antoine colen" <antoine.colen@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 08:48:56 +0200
List-archive: <https://www.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/trnsys-users>
List-help: <mailto:trnsys-users-request@engr.wisc.edu?subject=help>
List-id: "TRNSYS users mailing list at the Solar Energy Lab, UW-Madison" <trnsys-users.engr.wisc.edu>
List-post: <mailto:trnsys-users@engr.wisc.edu>
List-subscribe: <https://www.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/trnsys-users>, <mailto:trnsys-users-request@engr.wisc.edu?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/trnsys-users>, <mailto:trnsys-users-request@engr.wisc.edu?subject=unsubscribe>

Dear TRNSYS users,

I have got some problems with the type 696b :
- the output called "Dry air flow rate" and the input "Air flow rate"
are not correlated. The mass balance seems to be wrong.
- the following outputs are always equal to 0 : "Heating energy",
"Humidification energy", "Cooling energy", "Sensible cooling energy",
"Satent cooling energy" and "Reheat energy".

Is this type usable ?
Could someone help me ?

Tanks

--
Antoine Colen
Ingénieur industriel (Institut Gramme)
D.E.S. Energie - Environnement (Ulg)

Prev by Date: Re: [TRNSYS-users] type 56
Next by Date: [TRNSYS-users] TR : Problem with windows parameter
Previous by thread: [TRNSYS-users] Atrium and natural ventilation
Next by thread: Re: [TRNSYS-users] Problem with type 696b
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread